The French beverage company UniBev surprised Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) when last year it rushed to register the ‘CYBERCAB’ name as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
UniBev registered the ‘CYBERCAB’ trademark soon after the Tesla Robotaxi unveiling event, ‘We, Robot’ at Warner Bros. Studios last year. The Tesla team wasn’t expecting this and later found out that the French company held the trademark.
UniBev’s owners are most probably trying to cash out on this trademark by getting a monetary offer from Tesla. However, the automaker chose a different route; it challenged UniBev’s squatting of the Cybercab nomenclature with the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
According to the opposition document (Opposition No. 91305433) published on the USPTO website, Tesla filed for the opposition of the Cybercab trademark on Wednesday, 18th February.
– Advertisement –
Tesla Cybercab robotaxi vehicle with open butterfly doors and the ‘Cybercab’ wordmark in specific Tesla Cyber font style. Credit: Courtesy of Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), enhanced using Grok / X.
On Tuesday, 24th February, the USPTO sent the notice of Tesla’s challenge and trial date to UniBev. An answer is due from UniBev on Tesla’s opposition.
UniBev, as we previously discussed, is a beverage company. It has nothing to do with the automotive company and does not plan to ever launch a vehicle named Cybercab. Interestingly, it’s the same company that holds the Teslaquila, Cybertaxi, and the Cyberquad trademarks as well.
This French beverage company is literally stalking Tesla and squatting every possible vehicle name it can to bargain for a good deal with the automaker. UniBev does not realize that Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk, don’t give in to this sort of extortion. Thus, Tesla has challenged UniBev’s holding of the Cybercab trademark.
UniBev has 60 days to respond to USPTO’s notice of Tesla’s opposition to the Cybercab trademark. If the defendant fails to respond within the given time period, USPTO reserves the right to cancel and re-assign the trademark to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). In this case, UniBev is the ‘Applicant,’ and Tesla is the ‘Defendant’.
The USPTO notice document states:
Applicant must file an answer within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Failure to file a timely answer may result in the entry of default judgment and abandonment of the application.
– Advertisement –
The list of Tesla and Elon Musk-related trademarks held by the French beverage company UniBev. Source: Tesla, Inc., USPTO/TTAB (complete PDF below).
Grounds for Opposition
In its 167-page opposition file (PDF below), Tesla presented the Cybertruck word and design marks as the basis for its opposition to UniBev’s registration of the Cybercab trademark in bad faith (trademark squatting).
Since Tesla is already using the word ‘Cyber’ for its vehicle lineup, UniBev acquired the trademark to extort the automaker. Tesla is already selling the Cybetruck name and wordmark with previously registered trademarks.
Tesla also presented the screenshots and proofs of the widespread coverage of the We, Robot event, where the automaker unveiled the Cybercab/Robotaxi vehicle.
Tesla wrote in its opposition filing to USPTO:
On information and belief, Applicant filed the above-listed trademark applications solely on a speculative, bad faith basis. There is no evidence indicating that Applicant has ever had a good faith intent to market, promote, offer for sale, or sell any products or services under
any of these alleged marks in the United States or anywhere else in the world.
– Advertisement –
Verdict
Tesla has already started production of the Cybercab robotaxi at Giga Texas. The automaker plans to start mass production of the vehicle in April 2026. The automaker is also aiming to hand over the first $30K or less Cybercab to a customer before 2027.
In this situation, Tesla needs to resolve the trademark situation as soon as possible. Tesla has filed for additional ‘Cyber’ trademarks to safeguard its brand in the future.
You can read the entire opposition verdict of Tesla in the following file that the automaker submitted to the USPTO/TTAB.
Complete PDF of Tesla’s opposition file against UniBev’s bad faith trademark squatting of the Cybercab.
Stay tuned for constant Tesla updates, follow us on:
Google News | Flipboard | X (Twitter) | WhatsApp Channel | RSS (Feedly).
Related Tesla Cybercab News
Tesla challenges UniBev’s squatting of the ‘Cybercab’ trademark with the USPTOFebruary 26, 2026
Musk promises a $30K or less Cybercab delivery before 2027, Tesla (TSLA) produces the first unit at Giga TexasFebruary 19, 2026
Tesla files for additional trademarks for the Cybercab in some US states: Cybercar, Cybervehicle, RobotaxiFebruary 7, 2026
Tesla Cybercab butterfly door function spotted in the wild (video)February 2, 2026
Tesla begins Robotaxi service without safety monitors (Unsupervised FSD) in Austin, Texas (videos)January 23, 2026
Tesla Cybercab has so much that’s not obvious on the surface, says Elon MuskJanuary 9, 2026
