11 Electric Bike Brands That You Must Avoid AT ALL COST!

Every electric bike review talks about range and features, but none mentioned the brutal truth about brand safety. What if I told you that your dream ebike will burn down your house faster than any electrical fire ever could? That’s not dramatic. Defective batteries kill more dreams than poor reviews do. Imagine finally buying that perfect commuter solution only to discover it’s a ticking time bomb sitting in your garage. In this video, I’m breaking down the 11 electric bike brands that will destroy everything you own in 2025. And trust me, the number one choice will shock you. It’s so dangerous that it’s caused actual explosions and sent people to burn units. Watch every second because this isn’t just a buyer’s guide. It’s the difference between safe transportation or becoming another casualty of corporate greed disguised as affordable mobility. Let’s start our countdown and work our way up to the absolute most dangerous electric bike brand that should never be purchased under any circumstances. These aren’t just disappointing brands. These are companies that have put profit over human safety with devastating consequences. Understanding why certain ebike brands are dangerous is crucial because the market has exploded with budget options that prioritize low prices over basic safety standards. The research for this list comes from Consumer Product Safety Commission recalls, extensive consumer feedback from Reddit and Trust Pilot, and documented safety incidents that have harmed real people. Number 11, Ecot Trick. Starting our list is Ecotric, a brand that demonstrates how budget pricing often masks serious quality and reliability issues. This brand has earned its place due to persistent technical problems with motors and batteries, plus assembly challenges that can create safety hazards for unsuspecting buyers. The FAT20810 and Powersport models have been particularly problematic with users reporting motor failures and battery issues that can leave riders stranded or create dangerous situations during rides. When motors fail unexpectedly, especially on busy roads or remote trails, the safety implications become serious. Assembly challenges represent another significant concern because improperly assembled ebikes can develop mechanical failures that compromise rider safety. When manufacturers provide inadequate assembly instructions or use components that require precise installation, average consumers may unknowingly create dangerous situations. Tower Electric Bikes specifically notes that Ecotric scores low on reliability metrics, indicating systematic quality control problems rather than isolated incidents. While some users praise the brand’s affordability, the pattern of technical issues suggests that initial savings often turn into expensive repair bills and safety concerns. The combination of motor reliability issues, battery problems, and assembly challenges creates a brand that may seem attractive initially, but often disappoints buyers who need dependable transportation. For riders who prioritize reliability and safety over initial cost savings, Ecotric represents a risky choice. Number 10, Noctto. Noto earns its place on this list through a combination of low-quality components and customer support issues that can turn minor problems into major headaches. The Cruiser and Camel 250 models have been specifically criticized for using components that aren’t suitable for sustained ebike use. Tower Electric Bikes highlights that NATO uses lowquality components throughout their bikes, creating reliability issues that affect everything from braking performance to electrical system stability. When critical components like brakes or electrical systems are compromised, safety becomes a serious concern rather than just a quality issue. Customer support problems compound the component quality issues by making problem resolution difficult or impossible. Users on Reddit report defective bikes and poor support experiences that leave them with expensive paper weights rather than functional transportation. While some models have UL2849 certification, which provides basic electrical safety standards, the overall pattern of component quality issues and support problems, suggests that even certified models may have reliability concerns that affect long-term ownership satisfaction. The affordability that makes no attractive to budget conscious buyers often comes at the expense of component quality and support infrastructure that becomes crucial when problems arise. For buyers who need reliable daily transportation, Noto’s quality compromises may make it unsuitable despite its attractive pricing. Number nine, AD Motor. ADM Motor presents a deceptive case because the brand maintains a 4.2star Trust Pilot rating that might suggest quality products, but closer examination reveals significant warranty issues and customer service problems that can leave buyers stranded when problems arise. The disconnect between overall ratings and specific customer experiences highlights how average ratings can mask serious problems for individual customers. Users report motor failures on models like the M60R7 with customer service responses that fail to adequately address warranty claims or provide timely repairs. Motor failures on ebikes represent serious problems because motor replacement costs can approach or exceed the value of a used bike. When warranty support is inadequate or difficult to access, customers face difficult decisions about whether to invest in expensive repairs or accept the loss of their investment. The pattern of customer service complaints suggests that AD Motor support infrastructure may not be adequate for addressing the technical complexity of ebike repairs and warranty claims. Electric bikes require specialized knowledge and parts availability that not all companies can provide consistently. While some positive reviews highlight affordability and initial performance, the recurring pattern of warranty and support issues suggests that buyers should be cautious about long-term ownership satisfaction, especially if they rely on their ebike for daily transportation needs. Number eight, Fukare. Fukar’s Gemini and Libra models have generated mixed reviews that reveal significant concerns about customer service quality and electronic system reliability. The brand’s approach to customer support has left many buyers feeling abandoned when technical issues arise. Electronic failures in ebikes can be particularly problematic because they often require specialized diagnostic equipment and technical knowledge that average bike shops may not possess. When manufacturers provide inadequate technical support, even minor electronic issues can become expensive and timeconuming problems. Trustpilot reviews reveal complaints about missing parts and warranty challenges that suggest quality control and fulfillment problems. When bikes arrive incomplete or with defective components, the customer service response becomes crucial for determining whether the purchase becomes satisfactory or regrettable. Brake issues reported by users represent serious safety concerns that go beyond mere inconvenience. Brake system failures can cause accidents and injuries, making reliable brake performance and prompt warranty support essential for rider safety rather than just customer satisfaction. The mixed nature of fuchsist quality control and customer service that makes purchasing their products a gamble rather than a reliable investment in transportation. For buyers who need dependable performance and support, this inconsistency represents an unacceptable risk. Number seven, Ascend Pacific Cycle. Ascend ebikes from Pacific Cycle have earned their place on this list due to an official Consumer Product Safety Commission recall for fire hazards caused by battery issues. The Cababrio and Minouret models with specific model numbers were recalled in 2024, representing active safety threats to owners and their property. Fire hazards from ebike batteries represent the most serious type of safety defect because they can cause property damage, injuries, and even deaths. When the Consumer Product Safety Commission issues recalls for fire hazards, it indicates that the products pose unacceptable risks that require immediate action from owners. The fact that these bikes were sold through major retailers like Bass Pro Shops and Cabelas demonstrates how dangerous products can reach consumers through trusted retail channels. Many buyers assume that major retailers vet their products for safety, but the Ascend recall proves that dangerous products can still reach market through established distribution channels. Budget pricing often comes with safety compromises, and the Ascend recall demonstrates how cost cutting in battery systems can create life-threatening hazards. When manufacturers prioritize low prices over proper battery management systems and safety testing, the results can be catastrophic for unsuspecting buyers. The recall status makes Ascendikes unsuitable for purchase or continued use, regardless of their attractive pricing or retail availability. When official safety recalls are issued, the only appropriate response is to avoid the brand entirely until safety issues are conclusively resolved. Number six, Jetson. Jetson earns its position on this list primarily due to significant battery longevity issues and poor customer support that leaves buyers with expensive paper weights. When batteries inevitably fail, the Bolt Pro model has been particularly problematic with users reporting battery failures after just months of use. Battery replacement costs for ebikes can be substantial, often ranging from $400 to $800 depending on the system. When batteries fail prematurely and customer support is unresponsive, buyers face difficult decisions about whether to invest in expensive replacements or accept the total loss of their purchase. Amazon reviews consistently mentioned bikes dying after short periods of use, indicating systematic quality control problems rather than isolated incidents. When multiple customers report similar failures, it suggests manufacturing or design defects that affect product reliability across the brand. The difficulty in obtaining replacement parts compounds the battery problems by making repairs expensive and timeconuming even when customers are willing to invest in fixing their bikes. When manufacturers don’t maintain adequate parts inventory or distribution networks, minor problems become major headaches. Despite being ULlisted, which provides basic electrical safety standards, Jetson’s reliability issues demonstrate that safety certification doesn’t guarantee product longevity or customer satisfaction. Buyers need both safety and reliability for successful ebike ownership. Number five, Huffskco. Hobscope presents a particularly deceptive case because some models like the Hav Alpha and Hav Ranger have received positive reviews, creating a false impression of brand reliability that masks serious customer support problems reported by other buyers. A 2025 social media post reported a broken motor and poor customer support experience with a customer labeling Hobasco a scam. While individual experiences may vary, the severity of this complaint and similar reports on Reddit suggest potential systematic problems with customer service and product quality. Reddit users specifically complain about heavy bikes and unresponsive support, indicating that customer service problems may be widespread rather than isolated incidents. When multiple customers report similar support failures, it suggests systematic problems with the company’s customer service infrastructure. The weight issues reported by users can affect both bike performance and rider safety, particularly if the bikes are heavier than advertised or too heavy for their intended use. Excessive weight can make ebikes difficult to handle and potentially dangerous in emergency situations. The contradiction between some positive reviews and serious customer complaints creates uncertainty about brand reliability that makes Hovasco a risky choice for buyers who need dependable products and support. Number four, Voamart. Voamart specializes in budget eBike conversion kits that present unique risks because they require technical expertise and modifications that most casual riders aren’t equipped to handle safely. The inconsistent reliability of these kits creates safety hazards that extend beyond simple product quality issues. Electric Bike Forms reports dramatic variations in kit longevity, with some lasting over 1,000 mi, while others fail within 200 m of use. This inconsistency suggests quality control problems that make purchasing Voila kits a gamble rather than a reliable investment in electric bike conversion. The requirement for DIY waterproofing represents a serious safety concern because improper waterproofing can lead to electrical failures, fires, or electrocution hazards. When manufacturers transfer safety critical tasks to consumers without adequate technical support, they create dangerous situations for inexperienced users. Inconsistent power delivery reported by cycling weekly can create dangerous situations where riders can’t predict their bike’s behavior, particularly in traffic or challenging terrain. Unpredictable power delivery can cause accidents when riders can’t anticipate their bike’s response to throttle or pedal inputs. Conversion kits require technical expertise that most casual riders don’t possess, making Volart products unsuitable for average consumers who want reliable, safe electric bike transportation without extensive technical knowledge and modification skills. Before we continue with the top three most dangerous electric bike brands, make sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell for more content about avoiding transportation disasters that could destroy your life and property. Number three, Shang Milo. Shang Milo has earned its place among the most problematic ebike brands due to systematic battery durability issues and customer service failures that leave buyers with expensive bikes they can’t properly maintain or repair when problems arise. Battery failures occurring after just 5 to 6 months of use represent serious quality control problems that suggest inadequate testing and quality assurance during manufacturing. When batteries fail this quickly, it indicates either defective cells or poor battery management systems that don’t protect against premature degradation. Trustpilot reviews reveal delayed customer service responses and inadequate warranty support that makes problem resolution difficult or impossible. When technical issues arise with complex electric bike systems, responsive customer support becomes essential for maintaining safe and functional transportation. Users report specific problems with models like the MX01 and MX05, including broken screens and motor failures that affect both functionality and safety when multiple systems fail on the same bike models. It suggests systematic design or manufacturing problems rather than isolated component failures. Electric Bike Forums discussions highlight reliability concerns that extend beyond individual component failures to broader questions about brand quality and long-term viability. When Forum users consistently advise against specific brands, it indicates widespread negative experiences among actual owners. The combination of battery reliability issues, customer service problems, and multiple component failures makes Shang Milo particularly risky for buyers who need dependable daily transportation rather than experimental technology projects. Number two, Gyroar. Gyroar earns the second position on our list due to an official Consumer Product Safety Commission recall for fire incidents affecting their C3 ebikes with specific battery configurations. This recall represents active safety threats that have already caused real world fire incidents. The recall of all C3 ebikes with 10S4P battery packs in 2022 demonstrates serious safety defects that posed immediate fire hazards to owners and their property. When the CPSC issues recalls for fire incidents, it indicates that products have already caused actual fires rather than just theoretical risks. Bike Ride reported the fire incidents that led to the recall, proving that Guyroar’s safety problems resulted in real property damage and potential injury risks. Fire incidents from ebike batteries can cause house fires, garage fires, and other property damage that far exceeds the original purchase price. Mixed user reviews reveal additional quality concerns beyond the fire hazards, including reports of broken parts and poor customer support that compound the safety issues. When bikes have both safety defects and quality problems, the combination creates particularly dangerous and frustrating ownership experiences. The specific targeting of bikes with certain battery pack configurations suggests that Guyroar’s battery management and safety systems were inadequate for preventing overheating and fire hazards. This technical failure indicates systematic problems with product development and safety testing. Even bikes not affected by the specific recall may share similar design or manufacturing approaches that could create additional safety risks, making the entire Guyro brand questionable for safety conscious buyers. Number one, Nshir. Topping our list is the most dangerous electric bike brand to avoid is an which faced one of the most serious ebike safety recalls in recent history. In 2022, ANSIER recalled 22,000 ebikes due to fire and explosion hazards that resulted in actual injuries and property damage. The recall affected model AM00001907 sold between 2016 and 2022, representing 6 years of dangerous products that were sold to unsuspecting consumers. The scope of this recall demonstrates how widespread safety defects can affect thousands of riders and their families over extended periods. Six fire incidents and four burn injuries resulted from Anar’s defective lithium ion batteries, proving that these weren’t theoretical risks, but actual disasters that harmed real people. When ebike defects cause burn injuries, the consequences extend far beyond property damage to include medical expenses, physical trauma, and long-term health impacts. The Consumer Product Safety Commission recall notice specifically mentions fire and explosion hazards representing the most dangerous types of product defects possible. Explosions can cause severe injuries and property damage that can destroy homes and endanger lives throughout entire neighborhoods. Consumer Reports found and share bikes functional in testing, but noted pedal assist delays while the safety concerns dominated their evaluation. The fact that bikes could function adequately in controlled testing while still posing serious fire and explosion risks demonstrates how dangerous defects can hide behind apparently normal operation. Mixed reviews on various platforms highlight the pattern of fast shipping but lowquality components and unreliable support that characterizes an approach to business. When companies prioritize quick sales over proper safety testing and quality control, the results can be catastrophic for unsuspecting buyers. The combination of actual fire incidents, burn injuries, explosive hazards, and inadequate customer support makes the ultimate example of why brand selection matters for ebike safety. No amount of cost savings justifies the risk of house fires, explosions, and serious injuries that Enier’s products have already caused. Electric’s coverage of the brand notes the contrast between affordable pricing and serious reliability issues, demonstrating how attractive prices can mask deadly safety defects. When manufacturers cut costs on critical safety systems like battery management, the results can be fatal for users and their families. The six-year period during which dangerous end sheer bikes were sold demonstrates how safety defects can persist in the market for extended periods before being discovered and addressed. This timeline shows how many dangerous bikes may still be in use, continuing to pose risk to current owners. These 11 electric bike brands represent a comprehensive guide to avoiding the most dangerous manufacturers in the ebike market. From systematic quality control failures to actual fire and explosion hazards that have injured real people, these brands demonstrate why careful research and brand selection can literally be a matter of life and death for ebike buyers. Now that you know the 11 electric bike brands that could literally destroy your life and property, you’re probably wondering which bikes actually deliver safe, reliable long-distance performance. Some ebikes are engineered with proper safety systems and incredible range capabilities. That’s what I reveal in my video 20 best longrange electric bikes you can buy. Which bikes provide real world range without the fire hazards and safety disasters? [Music]

Every electric bike review talks about range and features, but none mention the brutal truth about brand safety. What if I told you that your dream e-bike will burn down your house faster than any electrical fire ever could? That’s not dramatic – defective batteries kill more dreams than poor reviews do. Imagine finally buying that perfect commuter solution only to discover it’s a ticking time bomb sitting in your garage.

▶️ Watch more videos from Tech Charge: 🔋
_____________________________________________
The UGLY Truth About Electric Cars…

_____________________________________________
When Will Electric Cars Become Affordable

_____________________________________________
The INSANE History of Electric Cars

_____________________________________________
This Tiny EV is a HUGE SUCCESS

_____________________________________________
First EV to Reach 1000 MILES Range

_____________________________________________
The First EV to Reach 1,000 km Range

_____________________________________________